File Geodatabase Raster Dataset
Tags
greater sage-grouse, Oregon, SageCon, functional habitat connectivity, current flow, pinch-points, GIS, Circuitscape, terrestrial biosphere, biota, environment
This dataset, included in the Oregon Decision Support System for Sagebrush Steppe (ORDSS), is a component of habitat connectivity analyses for Greater Sage-grouse (GSG) in southeastern and central Oregon conducted in 2014 in accord with the Sage Grouse Conservation Partnership (SageCon) by The Nature Conservancy in Oregon (TNC). Covering the full extent of linkage zones defined by the mapped normalized least-cost paths (NLCCs), the surface identifies ‘pinch-points’ between pairs of 'lek kernels' (see Jones et al. 2015, below). Pinch-points are areas within which connectivity could be severed with the loss of a relatively small amount of dispersal habitat.
The surface was produced using the open source Circuitscape program (McRae and Shah 2009) as called from the Pinchpoint Mapper tool in the Linkage Mapper toolbox (McRae and Kavanagh 2011). Circuitscape uses circuit theory –a branch of graph theory with a lexicon and algorithms specific to analysis of electrical circuit topologies –to model habitat connectivity across landscape mosaics. With the study landscape represented as a conductive surface, metrics including ‘effective resistance’, current flow, and voltage can be calculated to represent ecological processes such as individual species movement or gene flow across a metapopulation. In kind with graph theory more broadly, the circuit theoretic framework supports concurrent analysis of not only multiple but all possible species movement routes across a landscape (McRae and Shah 2009).
For each linkage in this study, current was applied between the associated pair of lek kernels. The current was run over squared resistance values to increase contrast in the resistance raster, and flow for each linkage zone was limited to areas below the same CWD distance threshold (10 cw-km) used to map the NLCCs. Locations of highly constricted and thus strong current flow are identified as ‘pinch-points’. Given the lower incidence or absence of alternative movement routes around such ‘bottlenecks’, habitat degradation and/or loss within them will, by unit area affected, entail a disproportionate adverse effect on connectivity. At a landscape scale, ‘pinch-points’are the areas at which linkages are most susceptible to being severed and which may deserve prioritization for habitat protection.
For prescriptively symbolized linkage zones, see 'SageGrouseConnectivity_LinkageZones.lyr' and for pinchpoints, see 'SageGrouseConnectivity_Pinchpoints.lyr'.
For more details, see: Jones et al (2015), below.
The Nature Conservancy in Oregon Jones, A., M. Schindel and S. Scott. 2015. Mapping Habitat Connectivity for Greater Sage-Grouse in Oregon’s Sage-Grouse Conservation Partnership (SageCon) Assessment Area. Produced by The Nature Conservancy (Portland OR) in partial fulfillment of BLM Cooperative Agreement L12AC20615. Available online: DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22266.08640. McRae, B.H. 2012. Pinch-point Mapper Connectivity Analysis Software. The Nature Conservancy, Seattle WA. Available at: www.circuitscape.org/linkagemapper McRae, B.H. and D.M. Kavanagh. 2011. Linkage Mapper Connectivity Analysis Software. The Nature Conservancy, Seattle WA. Available at: www.circuitscape.org/linkagemapper McRae, B.H., and V.B. Shah. 2009. Circuitscape user’s guide. The University of California, Santa Barbara. Available at: www.circuitscape.org
The Nature Conservancy shall not be held liable for improper or incorrect use of the data described and/or contained herein. Any sale, distribution, loan, or offering for use of these digital data, in whole or in part, is prohibited without the approval of the Nature Conservancy. The use of these data to produce other GIS products and services with the intent to sell for a profit is prohibited without the written consent of the Nature Conservancy. All parties receiving these data must be informed of these restrictions. The Nature Conservancy shall be acknowledged as data contributors to any reports or other products derived from these data.
Extent
West | -121.167021 | East | -116.652178 |
North | 44.798368 | South | 41.784375 |
Maximum (zoomed in) | 1:5,000 |
Minimum (zoomed out) | 1:500,000 |
These data are subject to revision
M - F; 9am - 5pm
M - F; 9am - 5pm
The Nature Conservancy in Oregon Jones, A., M. Schindel and S. Scott. 2015. Mapping Habitat Connectivity for Greater Sage-Grouse in Oregon’s Sage-Grouse Conservation Partnership (SageCon) Assessment Area. Produced by The Nature Conservancy (Portland OR) in partial fulfillment of BLM Cooperative Agreement L12AC20615. Available online: DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22266.08640. McRae, B.H. 2012. Pinch-point Mapper Connectivity Analysis Software. The Nature Conservancy, Seattle WA. Available at: www.circuitscape.org/linkagemapper McRae, B.H. and D.M. Kavanagh. 2011. Linkage Mapper Connectivity Analysis Software. The Nature Conservancy, Seattle WA. Available at: www.circuitscape.org/linkagemapper McRae, B.H., and V.B. Shah. 2009. Circuitscape user’s guide. The University of California, Santa Barbara. Available at: www.circuitscape.org
The temporal extent indicated for this dataset – 2014 to 2024 – is an estimate based on the accuracy and expected relevance of ground conditions as modeled to serve the data’s anticipated use(s). Note that most input datasets used in the development of this layer have ground conditions between 2009 and 2014, with the exception of fire burn data which spans back to 1984. For more details, see: Jones et al (2015); availabile online: DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22266.08640.
M - F; 9am - 5pm
M - F; 9am - 5pm
The Nature Conservancy shall not be held liable for improper or incorrect use of the data described and/or contained herein. Any sale, distribution, loan, or offering for use of these digital data, in whole or in part, is prohibited without the approval of the Nature Conservancy. The use of these data to produce other GIS products and services with the intent to sell for a profit is prohibited without the written consent of the Nature Conservancy. All parties receiving these data must be informed of these restrictions. The Nature Conservancy shall be acknowledged as data contributors to any reports or other products derived from these data.
No tests performed.
No tests performed.
This dataset was developed using model input data from the following sources: Bureau of Land Management, Federal Communications Commission, Institute of Natural Resources – Oregon State University, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Oregon Department of Agriculture, Oregon Department of Forestry, Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, Oregon Department of Transportation, United States Census Bureau, United States Department of Transportation, United States Forest Service, United States Geological Survey, The Nature Conservancy.
All processing detailed in Jones et al (2015); see DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22266.08640.
M - F; 9am - 5pm
Greater Sage-grouse Least-cost Paths (LCPs)
The Nature Conservancy in Oregon
Internal feature number.
Esri
Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated.
Current flow
The Nature Conservancy in Oregon
Cell Count
Esri
M - F; 9am - 5pm
M - F; 9am - 5pm
None, but users of these data should familiarize themselves with the content of this metadata document in order to interpret them appropriately.